Author: lindamayoux

  • Psychogeography and Edgelands

    Initial reactions to ‘Wire’ and ‘Power’ – I found the descriptions evocative and also reminiscent of forbidden forays of my own early teenage life with my best friend or my dog into old bombed sites and semi-urban lanes on the outskirts of Manchester – with their potential threats of meeting with men in wait for teenage girls, gang knife fights between rival football teams and the odd murder.

    Many of the descriptions also resonate with areas along my daily walk in Cambridge that I have chosen for ‘Transitions’. And the book is definitely one source of inspiration to which I shall return many times as I progress with that project.

    But I agree with Marion Shoard:

    This book could perhaps have had more investigative rigour. The edgelands now need something beyond a merely subjective celebration of their identity. Far more than our towns and countryside, they are being subjected to ceaseless change. Wild space is being prettified at the expense of its character and creatures. Industrial ruins are being cleared away.

    We could be in the process of losing this landscape just as we are discovering its charms. Should we be trying to conserve it, as we conserve the best of rural environments? Or would any attempt to regulate this space destroy the wildness that makes it special?

    It is time for us to consider what relationship we want to see in the long term between our activity in the edgelands, their epic infrastructure, their unique wildlife and industrial archaeology and their peculiar place in our imagination. 

    Marion Shoard Guardian Review

    Robert Macfarlane Guardian review

    Initial reactions to ‘Wire’ and ‘Power’ – I found the descriptions evocative and also reminiscent of forbidden forays of my own early teenage life with my best friend or my dog into old bombed sites and semi-urban lanes on the outskirts of Manchester – with their potential threats of meeting with men in wait for teenage girls, gang knife fights between rival football teams and the odd murder.

    Many of the descriptions also resonate with areas along my daily walk in Cambridge that I have chosen for ‘Transitions’. And the book is definitely one source of inspiration to which I shall return many times as I progress with that project.

    But I agree with Marion Shoard:

    This book could perhaps have had more investigative rigour. The edgelands now need something beyond a merely subjective celebration of their identity. Far more than our towns and countryside, they are being subjected to ceaseless change. Wild space is being prettified at the expense of its character and creatures. Industrial ruins are being cleared away.

    We could be in the process of losing this landscape just as we are discovering its charms. Should we be trying to conserve it, as we conserve the best of rural environments? Or would any attempt to regulate this space destroy the wildness that makes it special?

    It is time for us to consider what relationship we want to see in the long term between our activity in the edgelands, their epic infrastructure, their unique wildlife and industrial archaeology and their peculiar place in our imagination. 

    Marion Shoard Guardian Review

    Robert Macfarlane Guardian review

  • Mirrors and Reflections

    Mirrors and Reflections

    We never look at just one thing; we are always looking at the relation between things and ourselves

    John Berger, Ways of Seeing

    Photography is not, and cannot be an ‘objective’ art. Although the camera can only capture light bouncing off objects that are in front of the lens, the photographer behind the lens will always be making subjective judgements about:

    – what exactly to include in and out of the image and composition

    – when to take the image to include what they want in terms of eg action and lighting

    – how to take the image eg type of lens, depth of field, shutter speed

    Although all the above are affected by technological possibilities and constraints of particular cameras that have changed over time, photographs have always been made in relation to the photographer’s subjective purpose for the image:

    – feelings about the object (even if photographing cells under a microscope)

    – intended communication of those feelings for a particular audience

    – subjective reactions of different audiences to the image

    Lee Miller: A Portrait of Space

    Rick Poynor Exposure: Portrait of Space by Lee Miller in Design Observer 11/17/2015 (Links to an external site.)

    Lee Miller’s photograph is really intriguing – and becomes even more so the more I look and then read how it was made and constructed. I first saw Lee Miller’s work about 20 years ago at an exhibition in Paris. 

    When I first saw the image in the context of the topic thread here, I assumed that the rectangle was a small looking glass like the ones one often sees in bathrooms in India and Islamic countries. So a blank mirror reflecting nothing back of the photographer as if her mind was clouded, blank and probably depressed. Echoing then the arid stone desert outside. Obviously somewhere like Egypt or North Africa/Arabia but no culture or distinguishing features to be seen. A bleak landscape through a torn curtain seen by a blank mind. Just space.

    But when I looked up the discussion about how this particular version of the scene was constructed and why it was selected, I discovered I had misunderstood.

    Lee altered the framing of the whole photograph to try to accommodate a rectangular window in a square format camera exposure. The version seen here is taken very much closer to the window than earlier takes to de-emphasise the window, and focus more on the torn curtain.

    The ‘mirror’ is not actually a mirror at all, but one of a number of versions of framing that direct the viewer’s eye. In other versions the small black frame was positioned to focus on the escarpment on the left that was positioned so that the top converging lines of the curtain led the eye to the frame. It seems this was because the cabin where she stayed was one used by officials and visitors who might be more interested in the only ‘landscape feature’, rather than the stone desert. Placing the frame so that it frames part of the washed out sky is the ‘Portrait of Space’.

    But the viewer can choose where they look in the frame and let their gaze wander through different spaces, including examination of the torn curtain that now provides another frame, rather than a device to direct the eye to the horizon.

    So this is an image that is a choice of different windows, but actually revealing very little of what ‘objectively’ exists. The mirror being I think less a reflection of the photographer, than of what the viewer chooses to look at. And how far they choose to see past what the photographer has hidden through the device of the curtain.

    My own work

    In my own work I range across a whole continuum from windows to mirrors, and the various barriers between. Some of my projects  have been research-based more documentary images eg in preparing a Blurb photobook Anywhere Road I consciously question a range of different perspectives and photographic interpretations to become more aware of my subjectivity – and discovered a lot of new things in the process. Others projects are much more obviously my own interpretation of what I see. I have also been very interested in photographic textures eg in wood and stone that suggest fiction narratives but inspired by the particular location.

    Through the Window Pane

    One project ‘Through the Window Pane’ was shot in Shingle Street on the Suffolk Coast, referencing Alice Through the Looking Glass and clouded mirrors that distort and put things back to front.. I had unfortunately hurt my ankle just a day before the trip, so could not go out. And I was imprisoned watching Liz Truss’ budget and ware in Ukraine on the TV, just looking through the window. So I decided to make the most of it through a photoseries of the changing light, weather and views on my iPhone. This does I think indicate a lot about myself, what I choose to shoot and also select, how I interprete and then also manipulate what I have shot to further communicate my mood and sometimes a message.

    Through the Window

    Reflecting the Photographer

    What is on the ‘window lens’ distorting my view?

    Through the Window Pane Blurb Photobook  with poetry and text (Links to my SMUGMUG external website.)

    Cracks in the Edge

  • Authorship and Collaboration

    Authorship and Collaboration

    Task

    Whether working directly with another photographer or practitioner in the creative process,
    drawing upon the work or materials of others can offer new ways of thinking and new
    opportunities for creative output. Collaboration is also integral to operating effectively in
    professional arenas: you’ll need to utilise expertise that, for whatever reason, may not be
    readily accessible to you. Developing a positive approach to collaboration will lead to more
    opportunities and potentially make your practice more engaging.

    Reflect on your creative practice – your photography – and also maybe aspects of your life
    beyond or outside of this:

    • How have you allowed the input of others to shape your photographic practice?
    • What is your attitude towards drawing from the ideas of other people, or their work?
    • How do you discern between ‘collaboration’, ‘appropriation’ and ‘plagiarism’?

    “…we all more or less take the same photographs…But we don’t learn that at school and our parents don’t tell us, so there must be some kind of unspoken or unconscious code, of how we want to depict our lives, or our societies and this is not very well researched. We all contribute to that, there is not much originality and that’s also true for most of the photography we find in the art world. You find the same repetitive patterns there, they are just more consciously elaborated.”

    Joachim Schmid in CASPER, 2013 quoted Coursse material.

    “While the intent of photographing a sunset maybe to capture something ephemeral or to assert an individual subjective point of view – the result is quite the opposite – through the technology of our common camera we experience the power of millions of synoptic views, all shared the same way, at the same moment. To claim individual authorship while photographing a sunset is to disengage from this collective practise and therefore negate a large part of why capturing a sunset is so irresistible in the first place.”

    Penelope Umbrico in ALEXANDER, 2015: 61

    Project Process

    Keith Mason’s Proposal

    Place from Sunrise to Sunset – the differences between us (geography and life) and the similarities.

    Concept – take pictures of the sunrise and sunset on a particular day this week, plus three during middle of the day (say 11am, 1pm, 4pm).  Your shots could be from the same location (front door step) or varied. The result could be a visual time line of participants / group, or layering the photos into a collage or similar.

    My original idea: What colour is autumn?

    I would like to collaborate with people interested in collectively developing a series of alternative ‘essence of autumn’ images that are less stereotypical and more creative and meaningful for the 21st century than the ones we normally see.

    In Europe this month is now technically in autumn. But in UK there is abnormally warm weather over much of the country. What I see in my garden and walks by the river ranges from remnants of bright green to dull fading greens of dying grass, grey whites and browns of dried seed heads and white purple-veined convolvulus flowers spreading in dark green hedge shadows. The occasional yellow flowerhead, faded red poppy and blue cornflower. There are only occasional splashes of the traditional autumn oranges and reds of turning leaves that I assume will at some point in the near future burst to fill the conventionally picturesque autumn scene, Though actually what I see are mostly terminally shrivelled rusty browns of diseased horse chestnut trees.  I am anticipating later the melancholy end-of-year dark browns and purples of decaying wet leaves, punctuated with white grey mushrooms and fungus.

    I apologise for the late night lyricism. But I have many questions, for example:

    • What is colour anyway, given that we all perceive things rather differently? What does the camera capture when we talk of colour? How ‘accurate’ can photography be? and, given the variations in individual perception, what do we mean by ‘accurate’ amyway?
    •  What are the geographical differences in ’objective colours of autumn’? Are autumn colours different in urban areas and cities than in rural areas? In other regions of the Northern hemisphere? In the Southern hemisphere Spring?
    • How is ‘objective’ colour linked to our subjective emotional associations? How do different colours convey different moods associated with autumn? How does this vary between cultures? 
    • How does climate change and what we actually see this year affect our conception of ‘autumn colours’?

    These are only my initial late night thoughts. Other people may have very different conceptions and questions to shape the discussion. On a practical manageability level in the timeframe, photographs could be existing photographs, new images through the window of the street or garden, a walk around where you live or further afield, objects brought home, something more abstract etc etc etc etc.

    Collaboration process

    I proposed my original idea because it was very relevant for my landscape documentary work – raising issues about ‘photographic truth’:

    • how do concepts of ‘autumn’ relate to ‘reality’ and what is an ‘autumn picture’ compared to a picture ‘taken in the autumn months’
    • what might be meant by ‘accuracy’ of colours in digital capture and digital manipulation
    • how might concepts of autumn be changing as a result of climate change
    • how might different collaborators and viewers respond to the same concepts and issue.

    My idea got 2 likes, but no direct requests to collaborate.

    So I chose Keith Mason’s idea because it would enable me to ask similar conceptual and practical questions about sunrise and sunset. One of my main priorities at this stage of the course was to go back to basics to improve my photography technique. Before then getting back to more familiar territory of visual communication through experimenting with different digital styles, narrative construction and book design.

    Communications and organisation on Teams proved a bit difficult because of a combination of technical learning curve, lack of clear guidelines on exactly what to do (eg how to form a ‘group’, and differing time schedules of other work. All likely to be issues at the beginning of in other new collaborative processes, but made especially difficult because of the very short timeline to make decisions. Initially a third person asked to join our group, but left because they wanted to get on immediately and Keith was busy. So Keith and I made a group of 2 people and had a chat on Teams.

    Photographic process

    I also needed to start immediately – partly because I wanted to work when the weather forecast was sunny and therefore more conventionally ‘sunrise/sunset’ than the rest of the grey and rainy week.

    I woke up just before it got light and rushed down the road to catch the sun, but then it was difficult to know with the clouds exactly when sunrise started and ended. Then similarly with the cloudy sunset, I just stayed till I got too cold. But waiting around for a sunset that never really happened was a good excuse to just hang around, looking as if I had purpose, but enabling ‘participant observation’ ie eavesdrop on all sorts of random conversations, watching how people enjoyed their evening and get greater spontaneous understanding of how people felt about the location and the time of day.

    I don’t think I got any stunning images. I was still getting to grips with a new camera, so the project was really good to experiment with settings in very different lighting conditions. The sunrise also is the time along the river when it is crowded with joggers and rowers with their accompanying minders on bikes. So it was also good practice in making instant decisions on how to balance the shutter speed, aperture and ISO to get different effects. Then thinking how I can ‘improve’ through minimal processing in Lightroom.

    Technical Issues and questions

    Shot on Canon R5 with 28 – 105mm Zoom with autofocus and image stabiliser

    The sunrise and sunset images were shot at 1250 – 1600 ISO at -1EV in order to expose for sunlight highlights and get enough shutter speed to get reasonably sharp movement. Tripod would have not achieved this. These images were pretty noisy so I used Lightroom Denoise AI. Is there any way I can get better sunrise and sunset shots? Am I missing something obvious?

    In order to develop the book we worked on Teams, which proved pretty smooth to combine text chat and video calls to both pc and iPhone.

    We each sent an initial selection of images. I did an initial design mock-up, we then reviewed our selection of images to make a narrative.

    I think this was probably easier because there were only two of us. It might well be much more complex with more people.

    https://photography.zemniimages.info/theory-genre-concept/appropriation-and-authorship/
  • Health and Safety Strategies

    NB To be updated with advice on strategies that might be helpful to others and in the light of risk assessment and sustainability issues as I progress through the course.

    I have a number of health challenges (below) that affect the strategies and approach I decide to use in the projects in this course, and that I have taken into account in my planning. I am taking a conceptual approach exploring ‘Places in Time’ across a range of locations and focusing on digital photography with some art/printmaking work.

    On the positive side the constraints mean that I have to find new ways of doing things. But I need to:

    • diversify my activities, engaging in a number of parallel projects that alternate physical with computer work.
    • avoid doing too much photography when it is very cold, and make sure I make camerawork simple and wear gloves at that time.
    • avoid stress bottlenecks through taking time out walking when I start to get symptoms, and also mental time out focusing something new when I get stuck.
    • include projects that get me out of Cambridge and by the sea as well as projects around where I live so that I can get away from wood-smoke and traffic pollution – particularly in winter and hot periods in summer.
    • use my iPad for Zooms.
    • concentrate my referencing work using EndNote at the end of my assignments when I can have everything organised and pace myself properly.
    • avoid all photographic processes that involve exposure to solvents or chemicals analogue film developing and printing or printmaking. Cyanotype, Solar Plate, gelliplate transfer and PhotoScreen are all manageable as long as I avoid specific parts of the process and make sure I am working outside or in my own ventilated studio.
    • plan to make sure I can work with printouts and using a large TV screen sitting in a comfortable position in the evenings and if I start to get RSI.

    Managing Repetitive Strain Injury:

    I have been managing RSI since 1994 when I was registered disabled for 9 months. This is a long term postural issue caused by my neck and back working too long at a computer, but if I do not pay attention it spreads to my wrists and hands. It is also caused by general stress, and exposure of my hands to cold temperatures. This affects my handwriting and ability to cope with 24/7 computer spells for more than a few days. I experimented with voice recognition software, but this is very susceptible to changes in my voice (affected by my hypersensitivity issues below) and is also very slow and (despite much experimentation) not adapted for graphics work.

    However through careful management and appropriate exercise I have not had a major crisis since the early 2000s, apart from the occasional work bottleneck that I have to be careful to avoid. The strategies I found effective while doing my BA, alongside professional consultancy and other degree-level personal development courses in photography and writing are to:

    • diversify my activities, engaging in a number of parallel projects that alternate physical with computer work.
    • avoid stress bottlenecks through taking time out walking when I start to get symptoms, and also mental time out focusing something new when I get stuck.
    • using a stand-up desk, ergonomic mouse and graphics tablet as well as ergonomic keyboard. Together with iPad and iPhone sitting in a different position and outside my office. Laptops are difficult because of the relative position of the screen and keyboard for my neck, and limits of depending on voice recognition or graphics tablet for complex work.

    Hypersensitivity to atmospheric pollution

    Because of high levels of prior exposure to atmospheric pollution while travelling to pollution hotspots in Africa and Asia I am now hypersensitive to all wood smoke, traffic pollution and any chemicals and solvents giving off formaldehyde, ammonia and other fumes to be identified. This is not yet asthma and my lungs are currently fine, but doctors cannot do anything apart from advise me to avoid the triggers – mostly ones that research indicates are harmful for everyone. But this means I need to have sufficient flexibility in my projects and practice because:

    • there have been an increasing number of woodburning stoves since the cost of energy crisis last year – including neighbouring houses. Last year there were days and weeks when it was difficult for me to go out in the garden or down the street.
    • there are houses and houseboats with woodburning stoves along the river in winter, and high levels of dust from the towpath in hot dry spells in summer.
    • I have problems in many Cambridge Streets unless they are pedestrianised or along the Backs.

    Eyestrain

    • I have difficulty doing computer work and/or reading in the evenings in artificial light.
  • Summer Garden

    Stephen Gill Birds taking off, Trail Cam footage.

    Snails and slugs

    SloMo light?

    Solarplate and Cyanotype

    Moving Image

    Trailcam??

  • Clive Landen

    Clive Landen is a British wildlife photographer concerned with our relationship with animals. His pictures are quite explicit and upsetting to view, but he photographs horror with profound sensitivity and an almost painterly quality that makes us really look at the subject matter.

    The Abyss  series about the 2001 Foot and Mouth outbreak (only one photograph now available on line?). Landen began this project because restrictions meant that he couldn’t pursue his work on the relationship between the land and hunting. The impetus also came from childhood memories of the foot and mouth outbreak of 1967. Whilst the body of work is a pertinent historical document, it is also a personal one. Landen collaborated with the military and was seconded to a regiment, which allowed him free rein to access the sites where cattle were being burned and buried. He describes a photograph of one dead sheep amongst many as a “portrait of the sheep which looks benign, at peace.” (Landen (2007) in Source no. 51.)   His landscape containing a row of dead dairy cows and skeletons of trees is one of the most moving of the series. The pall of smoke that clung to these sites is visible, providing an almost painterly, pictorialist quality.

    Familiar British Wildlife series of images of roadkills. Article Source magazine  Camera Club images

     

  • Ingrid Pollard

    Website

    Through her practice, Guyanese-born artist Ingrid Pollard addresses her feelings towards the rural countryside as a non-white British subject, articulating her profound sense of being an outsider to these spaces. In some of her projects, Pollard hand tints black-and-white prints. This strategy has a dual purpose: firstly, it is a play on the idea of ‘colour’ in terms of race; and secondly, the use of this antiquated process immediately refers to nostalgic, romanticised ideals of the British landscape.

    In Miss Pollard’s Party (1993), Pollard parodies the tourist postcard, placing her own hand-tinted images on a template depicting ‘Wordsworth Heritage’.

    In Pastoral Interlude (1987) Pollard juxtaposes photographs of figures in the landscape (some of which are herself) with more subversive captions, such as: “It’s as if the Black experience is only lived within an urban environment. I thought I liked the Lake District; where I wandered lonely as a Black face in a sea of white. A visit to the countryside is always accompanied by a feeling of unease; dread.”

    Ingrid Pollard is unusual in that her practice addresses not only her sense of identity as a nonwhite British subject in the UK, but also her experience in relation to the countryside. What Pollard’s work also shows is that the concept of ‘environment’ in relation to the influence of a sense of place transcends geographical concerns alone. Whether a more deep-seated dichotomy exists between the interests of those from or living in the countryside and those in the towns is also a question that extends beyond UK borders.

    Listen to Ingrid Pollard talking about her work and landscape

    Source: Alexander p123

  • Edward Burtynsky

    Edward Burtynsky, OC (born February 22, 1955) is a Canadian photographer and artist known for his large-format photographs of industrial landscapes. Burtynsky’s most famous photographs are sweeping views of landscapes altered by industry: mine tailings, quarries, scrap piles. The grand, awe-inspiring beauty of his images is often in tension with the compromised environments they depict.

    Exploring the Residual Landscape

    Nature transformed through industry is a predominant theme in my work. I set course to intersect with a contemporary view of the great ages of man; from stone, to minerals, oil, transportation, silicon, and so on. To make these ideas visible I search for subjects that are rich in detail and scale yet open in their meaning. Recycling yards, mine tailings, quarries and refineries are all places that are outside of our normal experience, yet we partake of their output on a daily basis. These images are meant as metaphors to the dilemma of our modern existence; they search for a dialogue between attraction and repulsion, seduction and fear. We are drawn by desire – a chance at good living, yet we are consciously or unconsciously aware that the world is suffering for our success. Our dependence on nature to provide the materials for our consumption and our concern for the health of our planet sets us into an uneasy contradiction. For me, these images function as reflecting pools of our times.
    Ed Burtynsky website

    Oil  2009

    His series Oil (2009) resolves an epiphany he had in 1997, when he realised just how tightly connected all of our global activity was to petrol and its raw material – oil. The monograph is divided into three sections:
    • images of extraction and refinement;
    • the consumption of oil and motor culture;
    •  abandoned ‘oilfields run dry’ and motor vehicles of all descriptions resigned to huge scrap heaps.
    The images within Oil  evoke a terrifying sense of the sublime. It is within the third section that the images have their most potent effect, for instance seemingly endless rows of impotent, rusting fighter jets in Arizona, or a channel cutting through a canyon of stacked worn car tyres in California. Some of the most striking images are those made at the Chittagong ship breakers in Bangladesh. The proportions of the structures that the workers pick apart, almost by hand, are awesome, and just as affecting are the horrendous conditions in which they work. Although not overtly critical in any explicitly rhetorical sense (i.e. like Kennard’s montages), it is impossible to read Burtynsky’s position as anything but one of grave concern for our consumption of this valuable substance. Some images in Burtynsky’s Oil can be interpreted from different perspectives: great stacks of compressed oil drums or bits of car parts might speak of excess and consumption but, whilst they refer to manufacturing in a past tense, these are also the raw materials for current industries, ready to be melted down and turned into new things.

    China

    He has made several excursions to China to photograph that country’s industrial emergence, and construction of one of the world’s largest engineering projects, the Three Gorges Dam. Burtynsky discussing his work made in China

    Other work

    Wikipedia Burtynsky was born in St. Catharines, Ontario. His parents had immigrated to Canada in 1951 from Ukraine and his father found work on the production line at the local General Motors plant. Burtynsky recalls playing by theWelland Canal and watching ships pass through the locks. When he was 11, his father purchased a darkroom, including cameras and instruction manuals, from a widow whose late husband practiced amateur photography.With his father, Burtynsky learned how to make black-and-white photographic prints and together with his older sister established a small business taking portraits at the local Ukrainian center. In the early ’70s, Burtynsky found work in printing and he started night classes in photography, later enrolling at the Ryerson Polytechnical Institute. From the mid-1970s to early 1980s, Burtynsky formally studied graphic arts and photography. He obtained a diploma in graphic arts from Niagara College in Welland, Ontario, in 1976, and a BAA in Photographic Arts (Media Studies Program) from Ryerson Polytechnical Institute in Toronto, Ontario, in 1982. His early influences include Ansel Adams, Edward Weston, Eadweard Muybridge, and Carleton Watkins, whose prints he saw at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the early 1980s. Another group whose body of work shares similar themes and photographic approaches to Burtynsky’s work are the photographers who were involved in the exhibition New Topographics.

     

    Photographic series

    • 1983 – 1985 Breaking Ground: Mines, Railcuts and Homesteads, Canada, USA
    • 1991 – 1992 Vermont Quarries, USA
    • 1997 – 1999 Urban Mines: Metal Recycling, Canada Tire Piles, USA
    • 1993 – Carrara Quarries, Italy
    • 1995 – 1996 Tailings, Canada
    • 1999 – 2010 Oil Canada, China, Azerbaijan, USA
    • 2000 – Makrana Quarries, India
    • 2000 – 2001 Shipbreaking, Bangladesh
    • 2004 – 2006 China
    • 2006 – Iberia Quarries, Portugal
    • 2007 – Australian Mines, Western Australia
    • 2009 – 2013 Water Canada, USA, Mexico, Europe, Asia, Iceland, India

    Video: Manufactured Landscapes

    In 2006, Burtynsky was the subject of the documentary film, Manufactured Landscapes, that was shown at the 2007 Sundance Film Festival in the World Cinema Documentary Competition.

    Video: Watermark

    Burtynsky and Jennifer Baichwal, who was his director on the 2006 documentary Manufactured Landscapes, are co-directors of the 2013 documentary film, Watermark. The film is part of his five-year project Water focusing on the way water is used and managed.  

    Technique

    Most of Burtynsky’s exhibited photography (pre 2007) was taken with a large format field camera on large 4×5-inch sheet film and developed into high-resolution, large-dimension prints of various sizes and editions ranging from 18 x 22 inches to 60 x 80 inches. He often positions himself at high-vantage points over the landscape using elevated platforms, the natural topography, and more currently helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. Burtynsky describes the act of taking a photograph in terms of “The Contemplated Moment”, evoking and in contrast to, “The Decisive Moment” of Henri Cartier-Bresson. In 2007 he began using a high-resolution digital camera.

    The Long Now Foundation

    In July 2008 Burtynsky delivered a seminar for the Long Now Foundation entitled “The 10,000 year Gallery”. The foundation promotes very long-term thinking and is managing various projects including the Clock of the Long Now, which is a clock designed to run for 10,000 years. Burtynsky was invited by clock designer Danny Hillis to contribute to the Long Now project, and Burtynsky proposed a gallery to accompany the clock. In his seminar, he suggested that a gallery of photographs which captured the essence of their time, like the cave paintings at Lascaux, could be curated annually and then taken down and stored. He outlined his research into a carbon-transfer process for printing photographs that would use inert stone pigments suspended in a hardened gelatine colloid and printed onto thick watercolour paper. He believes that these photographs would persist over the 10,000 year time-frame when stored away from moisture. ——————————————

    Edward Burtynsky, OC (born February 22, 1955) is a Canadian photographer and artist known for his large-format photographs of industrial landscapes. Burtynsky’s most famous photographs are sweeping views of landscapes altered by industry: mine tailings, quarries, scrap piles. The grand, awe-inspiring beauty of his images is often in tension with the compromised environments they depict.

    Exploring the Residual Landscape

    Nature transformed through industry is a predominant theme in my work. I set course to intersect with a contemporary view of the great ages of man; from stone, to minerals, oil, transportation, silicon, and so on. To make these ideas visible I search for subjects that are rich in detail and scale yet open in their meaning. Recycling yards, mine tailings, quarries and refineries are all places that are outside of our normal experience, yet we partake of their output on a daily basis.

    These images are meant as metaphors to the dilemma of our modern existence; they search for a dialogue between attraction and repulsion, seduction and fear. We are drawn by desire – a chance at good living, yet we are consciously or unconsciously aware that the world is suffering for our success. Our dependence on nature to provide the materials for our consumption and our concern for the health of our planet sets us into an uneasy contradiction. For me, these images function as reflecting pools of our times.

    Ed Burtynsky website

    Oil  2009

    His series Oil (2009) resolves an epiphany he had in 1997, when he realised just how tightly connected all of our global activity was to petrol and its raw material – oil.

    The monograph is divided into three sections:

    • images of extraction and refinement;
    • the consumption of oil and motor culture;
    •  abandoned ‘oilfields run dry’ and motor vehicles of all descriptions resigned to huge scrap heaps.

    The images within Oil  evoke a terrifying sense of the sublime. It is within the third section that the images have their most potent effect, for instance seemingly endless rows of impotent, rusting fighter jets in Arizona, or a channel cutting through a canyon of stacked worn car tyres in California. Some of the most striking images are those made at the Chittagong ship breakers in Bangladesh. The proportions of the structures that the workers pick apart, almost by hand, are awesome, and just as affecting are the horrendous conditions in which they work. Although not overtly critical in any explicitly rhetorical sense (i.e. like Kennard’s montages), it is impossible to read Burtynsky’s position as anything but one of grave concern for our consumption of this valuable substance.

    Some images in Burtynsky’s Oil can be interpreted from different perspectives: great stacks of compressed oil drums or bits of car parts might speak of excess and consumption but, whilst they refer to manufacturing in a past tense, these are also the raw materials for current industries, ready to be melted down and turned into new things.

    China

    He has made several excursions to China to photograph that country’s industrial emergence, and construction of one of the world’s largest engineering projects, the Three Gorges Dam.

    Burtynsky discussing his work made in China

    Other work

    Wikipedia

    Burtynsky was born in St. Catharines, Ontario. His parents had immigrated to Canada in 1951 from Ukraine and his father found work on the production line at the local General Motors plant. Burtynsky recalls playing by theWelland Canal and watching ships pass through the locks. When he was 11, his father purchased a darkroom, including cameras and instruction manuals, from a widow whose late husband practiced amateur photography.With his father, Burtynsky learned how to make black-and-white photographic prints and together with his older sister established a small business taking portraits at the local Ukrainian center. In the early ’70s, Burtynsky found work in printing and he started night classes in photography, later enrolling at the Ryerson Polytechnical Institute.

    From the mid-1970s to early 1980s, Burtynsky formally studied graphic arts and photography. He obtained a diploma in graphic arts from Niagara College in Welland, Ontario, in 1976, and a BAA in Photographic Arts (Media Studies Program) from Ryerson Polytechnical Institute in Toronto, Ontario, in 1982.

    His early influences include Ansel Adams, Edward Weston, Eadweard Muybridge, and Carleton Watkins, whose prints he saw at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the early 1980s. Another group whose body of work shares similar themes and photographic approaches to Burtynsky’s work are the photographers who were involved in the exhibition New Topographics.

     

    Photographic series

    • 1983 – 1985 Breaking Ground: Mines, Railcuts and Homesteads, Canada, USA
    • 1991 – 1992 Vermont Quarries, USA
    • 1997 – 1999 Urban Mines: Metal Recycling, Canada Tire Piles, USA
    • 1993 – Carrara Quarries, Italy
    • 1995 – 1996 Tailings, Canada
    • 1999 – 2010 Oil Canada, China, Azerbaijan, USA
    • 2000 – Makrana Quarries, India
    • 2000 – 2001 Shipbreaking, Bangladesh
    • 2004 – 2006 China
    • 2006 – Iberia Quarries, Portugal
    • 2007 – Australian Mines, Western Australia
    • 2009 – 2013 Water Canada, USA, Mexico, Europe, Asia, Iceland, India

    Video: Manufactured Landscapes

    In 2006, Burtynsky was the subject of the documentary film, Manufactured Landscapes, that was shown at the 2007 Sundance Film Festival in the World Cinema Documentary Competition.

    Video: Watermark

    Burtynsky and Jennifer Baichwal, who was his director on the 2006 documentary Manufactured Landscapes, are co-directors of the 2013 documentary film, Watermark. The film is part of his five-year project Water focusing on the way water is used and managed.

    Technique

    Most of Burtynsky’s exhibited photography (pre 2007) was taken with a large format field camera on large 4×5-inch sheet film and developed into high-resolution, large-dimension prints of various sizes and editions ranging from 18 x 22 inches to 60 x 80 inches. He often positions himself at high-vantage points over the landscape using elevated platforms, the natural topography, and more currently helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. Burtynsky describes the act of taking a photograph in terms of “The Contemplated Moment”, evoking and in contrast to, “The Decisive Moment” of Henri Cartier-Bresson. In 2007 he began using a high-resolution digital camera.

    The Long Now Foundation

    In July 2008 Burtynsky delivered a seminar for the Long Now Foundation entitled “The 10,000 year Gallery”. The foundation promotes very long-term thinking and is managing various projects including the Clock of the Long Now, which is a clock designed to run for 10,000 years. Burtynsky was invited by clock designer Danny Hillis to contribute to the Long Now project, and Burtynsky proposed a gallery to accompany the clock. In his seminar, he suggested that a gallery of photographs which captured the essence of their time, like the cave paintings at Lascaux, could be curated annually and then taken down and stored. He outlined his research into a carbon-transfer process for printing photographs that would use inert stone pigments suspended in a hardened gelatine colloid and printed onto thick watercolour paper. He believes that these photographs would persist over the 10,000 year time-frame when stored away from moisture.

     

  • Richard Long

    Long, in particular, has sought to distance his practice from the epic scale of works by Smithson and Michael Heizer. Long branded these kinds of works negatively as ‘capitalist art’, because of the way they absorbed the land and because of the financial resources necessary for their production (Andrews, 1999, p. 215).

    Long espoused a less interventionist approach to making land art, as well as simpler, less obtrusive sculptures that have a minimal impact upon the landscape. In addition to the sculptures they produced and documented with photography, Fulton and Long have focused on the meditative process of walking, and conceive of the act of walking as an art form in itself. The outcomes of this activity may be a combination of photographs and notes of objects and events observed, and perhaps also a sculptural aspect using materials from the walk. River Avon Mud Circle (2011) is one such example of this approach.

    A talk by Clarrie Wallis, curator of Richard Long’s show Heaven and Earth, Tate Britain 2009:
    http://www.tate.org.uk/context-comment/audio/richard-long-curators-talk
    Sean O’Hagan’s preview of Heaven and Earth:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2009/may/10/art-richard-long

  • Mishka Henner

    No Man’s Land (2011) by Mishka Henner is one body of work that has faced particularly hostile criticism. In his series of Street View images, Henner has singled out prostitutes soliciting clients along the sides of roads on the outskirts of cities in Italy and Spain, which Google’s cameras have happened to pick up. The work also exists as a video, which animates the action of a driver appearing to ‘hone in’ and turn their head towards the women as he drives past them. Although Henner reconstructs a view from within the driving seat and passes this experience on to the viewer, he was not the actual driver. Those who interpret Henner’s images as exploitative and
    voyeuristic overlook the point that through this work he draws to our attention the relentless, indiscriminate and inescapable eye of the Street View camera, and the power that is wielded by Google. The title of the work refers to the irony that, despite these women’s apparent wish to attract men, there are no men to be found within Henner’s views. But there is surely also a reference to ideas about territory and ownership, which is perhaps infringed upon by the Street View camera.